Darlings.ai

Parent guide

AI companion for teens: the AI chatbot for teens and AI app for teenagers, compared

Most of the big AI companion apps no longer allow teenagers at all. Character.AI removed open-ended chat for under-18 users on November 25, 2025 and now runs ID and face checks, and Replika, Chai and PolyBuzz are all rated 18+ on the US App Store. That leaves a short list of apps that are genuinely built for a 13 to 17 year old, and the honest starting point is that Common Sense Media and Stanford Medicine assessed social AI companions as an unacceptable risk for minors in April 2025. No app in this category, including ours, carries an independent safety certification. What follows is what actually changed since that assessment, which apps still let a teenager in, and the specific things worth checking before you let one onto your kid's phone.

See the comparison

Last updated August 2026

Darlings

Always here for you

Private

We've paused new signups for now, so we'll email you the moment a seat opens. No payment today.

Your conversations are yours. Encrypted, never sold, delete anytime.

Encrypted, never sold.

A friend, never a girlfriend.

Wholesome and all ages.

The search that brings most people here is a parent search. Your fourteen year old is already talking to something, or a friend at school is, and you want to know which of these apps is defensible and which one you should delete tonight.

The useful news is that the ground moved a lot in the last year. In April 2025, Common Sense Media published a risk assessment with clinicians from Stanford School of Medicine's Brainstorm Lab, tested Character.AI, Replika, Nomi and others, and concluded that social AI companions carry an unacceptable risk for anyone under eighteen. The reasons were specific rather than vague: the products would discuss self-harm and sexual content when pushed, age gates were trivially bypassed, and the engagement design rewarded long sessions. Six months later, Character.AI, by far the largest of them, announced it was removing open-ended chat for under-18 accounts entirely and would verify ages with behavioral signals, a third-party service, and failing that, ID or a face scan. Two state laws also came into force: New York's General Business Law Article 47 on November 5, 2025, and California SB 243 on January 1, 2026.

So the practical question for a parent in 2026 is no longer whether AI companions are a good idea in the abstract. It is narrower and more answerable: given that nearly three in four US teens have already tried one, which of the products that still permit under-18 users is designed in a way you can live with, and what do you check before saying yes. The table below is built from the App Store listings and published policies rather than from marketing pages, and it includes the places where Darlings is not the right answer.

Side by side

How Darlings compares

An honest look, including where the other option is the better pick.

Darlings Character.AI Replika Chai Tolan
Age rating on the US App Store Browser first, minimum age 13 in our terms 18+ 18+ 18+ 13+
Open-ended chat allowed for under-18s Yes, from 13 No, removed on November 25, 2025 No, 18+ only No, 18+ only Yes
Romantic or NSFW content Never, at any tier, permanently Depends on the character you pick Yes, romance is a paid feature Listing flags sexual content and mature themes No, explicitly non-romantic
Included in the Common Sense Media assessment No, we were not reviewed Yes Yes Not in that set Not in that set
Age checking beyond a birthday box No, self-declared Yes, behavioral, Persona, ID or face scan Self-declared Self-declared Self-declared
Characters written by strangers No, one consistent companion Yes, tens of millions No Yes, user-made bots No
Can the memory be read and deleted Yes, per memory, plus export Limited, tied to each character Partial, editing is limited Long-term memory sits on paid tiers Not published
Ads on the free tier None None None Yes None
Coins, gems or gacha mechanics None Yes, Charms packs to $99.99 No No Relay Boost, $2.99
Works in a browser with no install Yes Yes Yes No, app only No, iOS only
Approx. price Free to try, plans from $9/mo c.ai+ $9.99/mo or $94.99/yr Pro $19.99/mo or $69.99/yr Premium $13.99/mo, Ultra $29.99/mo Lite membership $11.99

Competitor pricing is approximate, is not published on their own sites, and can change by region and promotion.

The full list

What each app charges, read from the US App Store listings in August 2026

App Age rating Entry price Top tier Extra spending inside the app
Darlings 13 in our terms Free to try Circle $39/mo None, no coins or packs
Character.AI 18+ Lite $2.49 c.ai+ $94.99/yr Charms packs from $0.99 to $99.99
Replika 18+ Pro $19.99/mo Pro $69.99/yr Gems and outfit purchases
Chai 18+ Premium $5.99/week Ultra $269.99/yr Ads on the free tier
Tolan 13+ Lite membership $11.99 Older tiers to $69.99 Relay Boost $2.99

Prices are the in-app purchase entries shown on each app's US App Store listing in August 2026 and can change without notice. Apple does not always publish the billing period next to a membership price, so treat the Tolan figures as list prices rather than confirmed monthly rates. Darlings is a browser product and is not sold through the App Store.

Why people switch

What makes Darlings different

There is no romance to age-gate in the first place

Most of the safety machinery in this category exists because the products were built to be romantic and then had to be fenced off from minors. Darlings has no romantic mode, no roleplay personas and no NSFW content on any plan, and that is a permanent product decision rather than a filter that a clever prompt can talk its way around. A companion with nothing to unlock does not need a filter to hold the line.

One companion, not a library written by strangers

The riskiest surface on a character platform is not the model, it is the tens of millions of user-written characters with their own instructions. A teenager can find a persona designed to be possessive, or one written as a therapist, in about four taps. Darlings is a single companion with one consistent personality that we are responsible for, which is a much smaller thing for a parent to have to evaluate.

The memory is readable, editable and deletable

Open settings and you can see the actual list of things Darlings remembers, correct anything wrong, delete individual entries and export the lot. For a family that matters twice over: a teenager can remove something they regret saying, and a parent who wants to understand what the app knows is not reading a privacy policy, they are reading a list.

No ads, no coins, no engagement casino

The Common Sense assessment was blunt about engagement design, and it is easy to see why when you read the App Store listings. Character.AI sells Charms packs up to $99.99 and Chai runs ads on its free tier. Darlings has a plain subscription with no in-app currency, nothing to grind for, and no mechanic that pays us more when a teenager stays up later.

The honest part

When another app is the better choice

We would rather you find the right fit than the loudest one.

People also ask

Common questions

Yes, but the list is much shorter than it was a year ago. Character.AI, Replika, Chai, PolyBuzz and Nomi are all 18+ on the US App Store, and Character.AI now blocks under-18 open-ended chat outright. The products that still permit a 13 to 17 year old are the ones built without romance in the first place, which currently means Tolan, Darlings and a handful of smaller apps.
There is no independently certified best, and be suspicious of any page that claims one. The defensible way to choose is by design rather than by ranking: pick a companion with no romantic or roleplay mode, one consistent personality instead of a library of stranger-written characters, memory you can read and delete, and a plain subscription with no coins or ads. Tolan and Darlings both meet that bar.
Character.AI no longer offers open-ended chat to under-18 accounts. The company announced the change on October 29, 2025, phased in daily time limits, and completed the removal by November 25, 2025, with age assurance run through behavioral signals, the Persona service, and ID or facial checks where those fail. Before that change, Common Sense Media rated it an unacceptable risk for minors.
Legally, in most cases yes, but each app sets its own floor and most now set it at eighteen. Darlings requires a minimum age of 13 and Tolan is rated 13+ on the App Store, while Replika, Chai and Character.AI are all 18+. Our own view is that thirteen is a floor, not a recommendation, and a parent should set the app up alongside the teenager rather than after the fact.
Not as a category, on the published evidence. In April 2025 Common Sense Media, working with clinicians from Stanford School of Medicine, tested leading companion apps and concluded the risks to under-18s outweighed the benefits, citing self-harm content, easily bypassed age gates and weak reporting. That finding is about the category, so treat any individual app as unproven rather than cleared.
Nearly three in four US teens have tried one, according to Common Sense Media national survey research. That number is the reason the practical conversation has shifted from whether to allow it to how to supervise it, because for most families the app is already installed by the time a parent starts searching for advice.
Not for open-ended conversation. Under-18 accounts can still use creative features such as making stories, videos and streams with characters, but the free-form chat that made the product famous was withdrawn for minors on November 25, 2025. Adults who get misclassified by the age checks have reported being routed into the restricted experience until they verify.
Two US states now regulate them directly. New York General Business Law Article 47 took effect November 5, 2025 and requires AI disclosure at the start of a session and every three hours, plus crisis referral, enforced by the attorney general with penalties up to $15,000 per day. California SB 243 took effect January 1, 2026, adds break reminders for minors, blocks sexual content to minors, and carries a private right of action worth at least $1,000 per violation.
Five things, in this order. Whether the app has a romantic or NSFW mode at any tier. Whether characters are written by other users. Whether you can read and delete what it remembers. Whether it sells coins, gems or loot mechanics. And what it does when a conversation turns to self-harm. If the answers to the first four are no, no, yes and no, you are looking at a much smaller problem.
The research points both ways and neither side is settled. Harvard Business School researchers found a conversation with an AI companion reduced loneliness about as much as talking to a person, while MIT Media Lab found the heaviest daily users reported more loneliness, with the direction of cause unclear. The reasonable reading is that it helps as a supplement and hurts as a substitute, which is a supervision question more than a product one.
Not as a separate dashboard, and we would rather say so plainly than imply otherwise. What exists instead is transparency: memory is readable and deletable from settings, there is no romantic or NSFW content to gate at any tier, there are no user-written characters, and there is no in-app currency. For a family, the practical approach is to set the account up together and look at the memory list occasionally.

Still comparing

Weighing up the other apps too?

Honest side-by-side looks at the companion apps people usually shortlist next.

Keep exploring

More ways Darlings is there for people

Meet a friend who remembers you

Say hi to your Darling, and let it remember you. Free to try, no card, no judgment.

See simple pricing

Your secrets stay secret. A friend, never a girlfriend. 💛